• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • COVID-19 Response
  • Attorneys
    • Richard Cordell Low
    • Matthew A. Grosh
    • Brad Zuke
  • Staff
    • Diane Coyle
    • Susan Dreyer
    • Erin Hirschmann
    • Christina Warfel
    • Jeanna Johnson
  • Blog
  • Articles
  • Contact
Herr & Low Logo

We Take It Personally.

  • PH: 717-397-7544

Police Officer Collects on Insurance Policy Despite Exclusion Clause

It took nine years, but a Pennsylvania man finally has resolution for a 2002 neck injury he suffered in a car crash while on duty as a police officer. He has since been unable to work, has racked up extensive medical bills, and has been stuck in litigation with an insurance company for many years.

The officer’s employer had purchased workers’ compensation insurance, which paid two-thirds of his salary. The officer also received one-third of his salary from Sugarcreek Borough and $25,000 in auto insurance coverage on the car that caused the accident. Unfortunately, the officer’s costs were significantly higher than the benefits he received.

In response to ever increasing medical costs, the officer sought to recover under an underinsured motorist policy issued to his employer by a local insurance company. According to USA Today, nearly 14 percent of drivers in America lack any insurance, much less adequate insurance, so such policies are prudent for employers whose employees drive a significant amount. In Pennsylvania, a driver is only required to have $15,000 in coverage for injuries to another person.

If successful, the officer would be entitled up to the $100,000 in coverage per incident. His claim was denied because the policy had an exclusion clause, which stated no one could recover under this policy if they were eligible for workers’ compensation benefits.

Lengthy Litigation Ensues

The officer brought his claim to court, originally winning at trial before an appellate court reversed the ruling and found in favor of the insurance company. He then appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court – by this time several years had already passed.

The officer argued that the exclusion was contrary to public policy, because most claims under the policy would be brought by someone eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, thus making the coverage illusory. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed, adding that the insurance company had received a windfall by charging a premium for the coverage that would almost never be applicable.

In the end the officer received the compensation he needed to cover the costs of the accident. However, similar litigation is not uncommon as many insurance policies have multiple exclusion clauses. Therefore, anyone who has been injured on the job or needs help with a workers’ compensation claim should speak with an experienced lawyer immediately to discuss their rights and legal options. It would also be wise to have your coverage reviewed by a lawyer with experience in automobile accident claims.

Follow Our Firm

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow Us On LinkedIn

Primary Sidebar

HOW CAN WE HELP?

Tell Us About Your Legal Issue
  • close
    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.
    Privacy Policy
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Secondary Sidebar

  • Personal injury
    • Personal Injury
    • Premises Liability
    • Negligent Lighting And Security
    • Elevator Injuries
    • Retail Store Accidents
    • Slip and Fall Accidents
    • Brain Injuries
    • Spinal Cord Injuries
    • Soft Tissue Injuries
    • Burn Injuries
    • Wrongful Death
    • Car Accidents
    • Fatal Auto Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents: Insurance Issues and Medical Bills
    • Truck Accidents
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • T-Bone Accidents
    • Bus Accidents
    • Rear-End Collisions
    • Head-On Collisions
    • Taxi Accidents
    • Drunk Driver Accidents
    • Distracted Driving Accidents
  • Worker’s Compensation
    • Worker’s Compensation
    • Work-Related Injuries
    • Construction Accidents
    • Ladder Accidents
    • Scaffolding Accidents
    • Farm Accidents
    • Heavy Equipment And Machinery Accidents
    • Work Vehicle Accidents
  • Business Law
    • Business Law
    • Small Business Formations And Acquisitions
    • Contract Law
  • Nonprofits And Tax-Exempt Organizations
  • Commercial and Residential Real Estate
  • Mediation
  • Estate Planning
    • Estate Planning Law
    • Becoming A Power Of Attorney For Elderly Parents
    • Estate Administration
    • Probate Litigation

Herr & Low, P.C.
234 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Phone: 717-397-7544
Fax: 717-397-8227
Lancaster Law Office Map

Attorneys

Richard Cordell Low
rlow@herrlow.com

Matthew A. Grosh
mgrosh@herrlow.com

Brad Zuke
brad@herrlow.com

Herr & Low Logo

We Take It Personally.

Herr & Low, P.C., represents clients throughout central Pennsylvania, including individuals, families and businesses in Lancaster, Manheim Township, Ephrata, Lititz, Elizabethtown, Gap, Millersville, Columbia, Manheim and Strasburg, as well as clients in communities in Lancaster County, York County, Chester County, Dauphin County and Lebanon County.
Copyright ©2021 Herr & Low, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer Site Map Privacy Policy